vrf configuration with same addresses

[Semion Lisyansky]

Thanks a lot

--
Semion Lisyansky


On Mon, Nov 5, 2018 at 5:37 PM Ondrej Zajicek <santiago at crfreenet.org>
wrote:

> On Mon, Nov 05, 2018 at 05:28:44PM +0200, Semion Lisyansky wrote:
> > protocol bgp bgp_vrf01_n2 {
> >         vrf "vrf01";
> >         local as 65034;
> >         bfd yes;
> >         graceful restart;
> >         neighbor 192.34.1.4 as 65001;
> >         ipv4 {
> >                 table table_vrf01;
> >                 import all;
> > #                export all;
> >                 export where source = RTS_BGP;
> >         };
> > }
> >
> > protocol bgp bgp_vrf01_ixia1 {
> >         local as 65034;
> > #        bfd yes;
> >         neighbor 190.34.32.101 as 65134;
> >         graceful restart;
> >         ipv4 {
> >                 table table_vrf01;
> >                 import all;
> >                 export all;
> >         };
> > }
>
> The protocol bgp_vrf01_ixia1 is not associated with VRF (does not use
> 'vrf' option, unlike bgp_vrf01_n2 above), so its routes are not
> associated with vrf1 and lookup is done through all interfaces.
>
> --
> Elen sila lumenn' omentielvo
>
> Ondrej 'Santiago' Zajicek (email: santiago at crfreenet.org)
> OpenPGP encrypted e-mails preferred (KeyID 0x11DEADC3, wwwkeys.pgp.net)
> "To err is human -- to blame it on a computer is even more so."
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://trubka.network.cz/pipermail/bird-users/attachments/20181105/cc9543cf/attachment.html>