OSPF "hack translation" sought

[Ondrej Zajicek]

On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 02:46:55PM +0200, Clemens Schrimpe wrote:
> Gentlepeople -
> 
> I was wondering what the "translation" of the usual hack on
> Quagga/JunOS/etc. for OSPF into a proper BIRD config was to allow OSPF to
> propagate routes to directly connected networks, which are not really
> part of an OSPF area. In those other systems I would make those
> interfaces just "passive" members, but BIRD doesn't know "passive
> interfaces". Making them stubs has obvious other side effects, which is
> why I just want the "passive" hack to work under BIRD. 

Hi

I do not really understand what you want. AFAIK, BIRD OSPF 'stub'
interfaces are more-or-less equal to 'passive' interfaces. What you mean
by 'side effects' of stub ifaces?

-- 
Elen sila lumenn' omentielvo

Ondrej 'Santiago' Zajicek (email: santiago at crfreenet.org)
OpenPGP encrypted e-mails preferred (KeyID 0x11DEADC3, wwwkeys.pgp.net)
"To err is human -- to blame it on a computer is even more so."
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 181 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://trubka.network.cz/pipermail/bird-users/attachments/20160929/4e3eb8f0/attachment.asc>