Bird 1.5.0: protocol 'direct' looses routes

[Ondrej Zajicek]

On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 01:25:28PM +0300, Andrew wrote:
> 17.06.2015 13:09, Ondrej Zajicek пишет:
> >On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 11:11:22PM +0300, Andrew wrote:
> >>Also, with 1.5.0 I have long OSPF initialization (near 2 minutes - 1.4.5 and
> >>quagga starts much faster). I have OSPF debug log; should I attach it to
> >>mail (does mailing list supports attaches), or should I send it to your
> >>personal mail?
> >The mailing list accepts attachments, you could send logs there. Also it
> >would be useful to attach your OSPF configuration. Or you could send it
> >directly to my personal mail, if you want.
> >
> >In 1.5.0 there are changes in OSPF initialization, it is much faster in
> >my test setup but it is possible that there might be some issues in some
> >border cases. Unfortunately, OSPF initialization is just loosely
> >specified by RFC 2328 and there are plenty of unspecified details.
> >
> >I wonder if others have some negative or positive experience with OSPF
> >initialization (neighbor establishment) in 1.5.0 compared to previous
> >versions.

> Ok, log is in attach.

Relevant neihgbors are 10.255.192.101 and 10.255.192.102, while the local
router ID is 10.255.0.21?

What OSPF implementation is used by these neighbors? How long it took for
BIRD 1.4.5 and Quagga?

-- 
Elen sila lumenn' omentielvo

Ondrej 'Santiago' Zajicek (email: santiago at crfreenet.org)
OpenPGP encrypted e-mails preferred (KeyID 0x11DEADC3, wwwkeys.pgp.net)
"To err is human -- to blame it on a computer is even more so."
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 181 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://trubka.network.cz/pipermail/bird-users/attachments/20150618/1f2b718b/attachment.asc>