ERR when redistributing to OSPF NSSA
Ondrej Zajicek
santiago at crfreenet.org
Fri Sep 30 08:00:49 CEST 2011
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 09:42:24PM +0100, Alex Bligh wrote:
> Ondrej,
>
> --On 29 September 2011 22:50:25 +0200 Ondrej Zajicek
> <santiago at crfreenet.org> wrote:
>
>> BTW, there is a similar (but mostly harmless) bug not related to NSSA -
>> if an interface appears and there is a static route configured that goes
>> through that iface, the static protocol receives the iface notification
>> and generates the route, which is propagated to an ospf protocol before
>> the iface notification, so gw is not found and the route is propagated
>> without one.
>
> That sounds like it might be what I'm seeing (see mail entitled
> "Directly connected interface redistribution problem" - yes I will
> get you the debug output you wanted, the test environment got
> rebuilt before I could get it), as what we're doing is redistributing
> static routes.
>
> Do you have a fix I could try?
May be, but in my case the route is propagated, just without explicit
forwarding address (so the propagating router is used as one, which is
OK). I don't have a proper fix for that, it is a bit tricky problem.
For a workaround it might help to reorder protocols in config file
(OSPF before static, you can check in log file whether OSPF gets iface
notifications before static).
--
Elen sila lumenn' omentielvo
Ondrej 'SanTiago' Zajicek (email: santiago at crfreenet.org)
OpenPGP encrypted e-mails preferred (KeyID 0x11DEADC3, wwwkeys.pgp.net)
"To err is human -- to blame it on a computer is even more so."
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://trubka.network.cz/pipermail/bird-users/attachments/20110930/3788884b/attachment-0001.asc>
More information about the Bird-users
mailing list