[PATCH 1/2] flex: Avoid REJECT name conflict.

[Joakim Tjernlund]

>
> Hello!
>
> > That choice does exist yet unless you plan to do it?
>
> The choice exists: either leave the current work-around, or change it to
> your work-around. Neither is a proper fix.

Right, neither is an ideal fix but at least mine is "correct" and doesn't
cause REJECT to be defined inside flex, causing warnings.

I don't understand your reasoning, you rather keep the buggy REJECT
instead of renaming the bison token REJECT to Reject because it
doesn't look as "pretty" anymore?

     Jocke