回覆: 回覆: Question: ROA verification does not work properly on bird 2.0.11

[haima]

Hi Maria, This is not an empty Funciton, it is complete as follows:


function is_rpki_invalid() {
        if roa_check(roa_table4, net, bgp_path.last) = ROA_INVALID then return true;
        if roa_check(roa_table6, net, bgp_path.last) = ROA_INVALID then return true;
        return false;
}


Thank you for your reply

Haima
MoeBee Network


            

            


            寄件者: Maria Matejka
已傳送: 星期一, 2023 年 1 月 23 日  23:55
收件者: haima; bird-users at network.cz
主旨: Re: 回覆: Question: ROA verification does not work properly on bird 2.0.11
            


            
Oh, looking at your previous post, I've spotted that on the previous 

line, you have this:



function is_rpki_invalid() { }



The ending brace creates an empty function and the following line is 

then probably misinterpreted as something strange.



Maria



On 1/23/23 16:50, haima wrote:

> Hi, Maria, Thanks for your reply,

> 

> Line 59 reads as follows:

>              

> if roa_check(roa_table4, net, bgp_path.last) = ROA_INVALID then return true;

> 

> 

> Thanks,

> 

> Haima

> MoeBee Network

>              

> 

> 

>              寄件者: Bird-users 代表 Maria Matejka via Bird-users

> 已傳送: 星期一, 2023 年 1 月 23 日  23:38

> 收件者: bird-users at network.cz

> 主旨: Re: Question: ROA verification does not work properly on bird 2.0.11

>              

> 

> 

>              

> Hello!

> 

>> bird will return the following error: /etc/bird/function.conf:59:22 Syntax error, unexpected CF_SYM_UNDEFINED, expecting CF_SYM_KNOWN

> 

> 

> 

> The numbers 59:22 are actually the line:char index in that file. Could

> 

> you please disclose what is in /etc/bird/function.conf around line 59 to

> 

> let us help you find out what's the case?

> 

> 

> 

> Thanks

> 

> 

> 

> Maria

>