Re: 回覆: Question: ROA verification does not work properly on bird 2.0.11

[Maria Matejka]

Oh, looking at your previous post, I've spotted that on the previous 
line, you have this:

function is_rpki_invalid() { }

The ending brace creates an empty function and the following line is 
then probably misinterpreted as something strange.

Maria

On 1/23/23 16:50, haima wrote:
> Hi, Maria, Thanks for your reply,
> 
> Line 59 reads as follows:
>              
> if roa_check(roa_table4, net, bgp_path.last) = ROA_INVALID then return true;
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Haima
> MoeBee Network
>              
> 
> 
>              寄件者: Bird-users 代表 Maria Matejka via Bird-users
> 已傳送: 星期一, 2023 年 1 月 23 日  23:38
> 收件者: bird-users at network.cz
> 主旨: Re: Question: ROA verification does not work properly on bird 2.0.11
>              
> 
> 
>              
> Hello!
> 
>> bird will return the following error: /etc/bird/function.conf:59:22 Syntax error, unexpected CF_SYM_UNDEFINED, expecting CF_SYM_KNOWN
> 
> 
> 
> The numbers 59:22 are actually the line:char index in that file. Could
> 
> you please disclose what is in /etc/bird/function.conf around line 59 to
> 
> let us help you find out what's the case?
> 
> 
> 
> Thanks
> 
> 
> 
> Maria
> 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 2839 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://trubka.network.cz/pipermail/bird-users/attachments/20230123/7014b486/attachment.p7s>