Multiple ebgp neighbours to the same peer

[Alexander Zubkov]

On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 3:06 PM Ondrej Zajicek <santiago at crfreenet.org>
wrote:

> On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 12:40:30AM +0100, Alexander Zubkov wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > A quick try to fix the problem. But I'm not sure in complete correctness
> > though.
>
> Hi
>
> That looks more-or-less OK, will merge.
>
> > -    ipa_equal(x->addr, y->addr);
> > +    ipa_equal(x->addr, y->addr) &&
> > +    ipa_equal(x->addr2, y->addr2);
>
> I think undefined addr2 should work like wildcard, i.e. the condition
> should be:
>
>
Maybe. I do not know well how this lock works. If different lock keys can
affect another. And in this case it is probably better to fix "local" role
for that second address and reflect it in its name.


>  ipa_equal(x->addr, y->addr) &&
>  (ipa_zero(x->addr2) || ipa_zero(y->addr2) || ipa_equal(x->addr2,
> y->addr2));
>
> (Undefined local ip will be resolved to some ip and may collide with
> defined ones.)
>
> --
> Elen sila lumenn' omentielvo
>
> Ondrej 'Santiago' Zajicek (email: santiago at crfreenet.org)
> OpenPGP encrypted e-mails preferred (KeyID 0x11DEADC3, wwwkeys.pgp.net)
> "To err is human -- to blame it on a computer is even more so."
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://trubka.network.cz/pipermail/bird-users/attachments/20230123/94f2cd3b/attachment.htm>