Unexpected RIP route output with Bird 2.0.11 vs Bird 2.0.10

Nigel Kukard nkukard at LBSD.net
Wed Dec 14 18:48:46 CET 2022


On 12/14/22 17:36, Maria Matejka via Bird-users wrote:
> Hello!
>
> On 12/14/22 16:38, Nigel Kukard via Bird-users wrote:
>> Hi guys,
>
> <pedantic>
> Sorry, I'm not a guy, yet I hope my answer helps you as well.
> </pedantic>


I'm terribly sorry, I did not mean to offend.


>
>> During testing of Bird 2.0.11 I noticed something a bit odd in terms 
>> of the output for RIP routes, is the below  "RIP.02" and "<type 16>" 
>> expected?
>>
>> 0001 BIRD 2.0.11 ready.
>> 1007-Table t_kernel4:
>>   192.168.21.0/24      unicast [rip4 2022-12-14 15:03:21] * (120/3)
>>      via 192.168.0.2 on eth0
>> 1008-    Type: RIP univ
>> 1012-    RIP.metric: 3
>>      RIP.tag: 0000
>>      RIP.02: *<type 16>*
>> 1007-192.168.11.0/24      unicast [kernel4 2022-12-14 15:03:17] * (10)
>>      via 192.168.10.2 on eth1
>> 1008-    Type: inherit univ
>> 1012-    Kernel.source: 3
>>      Kernel.metric: 0
>> 0000
>
> It's not expected to be written out, yet it's harmless otherwise. That 
> attribute has always been there, just hidden. It looks like an 
> incomplete backport of internal refactoring from v3 made it through to 
> 2.0.11 and this attribute got unwantedly unhidden.
>
> Sorry for the inconvenience. Please ignore that attribute for now.

Thanks so much for your prompt reply, very much appreciated.

-N



More information about the Bird-users mailing list