Unexpected RIP route output with Bird 2.0.11 vs Bird 2.0.10
Nigel Kukard
nkukard at LBSD.net
Wed Dec 14 18:48:46 CET 2022
On 12/14/22 17:36, Maria Matejka via Bird-users wrote:
> Hello!
>
> On 12/14/22 16:38, Nigel Kukard via Bird-users wrote:
>> Hi guys,
>
> <pedantic>
> Sorry, I'm not a guy, yet I hope my answer helps you as well.
> </pedantic>
I'm terribly sorry, I did not mean to offend.
>
>> During testing of Bird 2.0.11 I noticed something a bit odd in terms
>> of the output for RIP routes, is the below "RIP.02" and "<type 16>"
>> expected?
>>
>> 0001 BIRD 2.0.11 ready.
>> 1007-Table t_kernel4:
>> 192.168.21.0/24 unicast [rip4 2022-12-14 15:03:21] * (120/3)
>> via 192.168.0.2 on eth0
>> 1008- Type: RIP univ
>> 1012- RIP.metric: 3
>> RIP.tag: 0000
>> RIP.02: *<type 16>*
>> 1007-192.168.11.0/24 unicast [kernel4 2022-12-14 15:03:17] * (10)
>> via 192.168.10.2 on eth1
>> 1008- Type: inherit univ
>> 1012- Kernel.source: 3
>> Kernel.metric: 0
>> 0000
>
> It's not expected to be written out, yet it's harmless otherwise. That
> attribute has always been there, just hidden. It looks like an
> incomplete backport of internal refactoring from v3 made it through to
> 2.0.11 and this attribute got unwantedly unhidden.
>
> Sorry for the inconvenience. Please ignore that attribute for now.
Thanks so much for your prompt reply, very much appreciated.
-N
More information about the Bird-users
mailing list