bgp keepalive & hold timers
Ondrej Zajicek
santiago at crfreenet.org
Fri Dec 9 17:43:58 CET 2022
On Wed, Nov 09, 2022 at 06:05:27PM +0100, Ondrej Zajicek via Bird-users wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 09, 2022 at 05:34:07PM +0100, Ondrej Zajicek via Bird-users wrote:
> > The whole issue is a bit silly, as it is a result of too many knobs that
> > sometimes does not make sense. Setting keepalive independently of hold
> > time, when hold time is negotiated (so consistency cannot be validated in
> > config-parse time), is just bad design. It would be better if keepalive
> > could be defines as a fraction of negotiated hold time.
>
> Thinking about it, perhaps a better approach would be to just scale the
> keepalive timer based on (negotiated hold time / configured hold time).
Hi
Scaling implemented, with both 'min hold time' and 'min keepalive time'
option:
https://gitlab.nic.cz/labs/bird/-/commit/3859e4efc1597368df647323c5a3cc1771cb64ca
--
Elen sila lumenn' omentielvo
Ondrej 'Santiago' Zajicek (email: santiago at crfreenet.org)
OpenPGP encrypted e-mails preferred (KeyID 0x11DEADC3, wwwkeys.pgp.net)
"To err is human -- to blame it on a computer is even more so."
More information about the Bird-users
mailing list