Exact Definition of numbers-match bitmask-match and fragmentation-type

[Matt Corallo]

On 5/17/21 19:44, Ondrej Zajicek wrote:
> On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 01:48:19PM -0400, Matt Corallo wrote:
> You are right. My comment above is true for numeric ops, but for bitmask
> ops the ',' is the same as '&&', i am not really sure why. This seems
> confusing and it is undocumented.

Ha! right, yea, some documentation would be helpful. Just to double-check, fragmentation-type uses "," as ||, correct?

> Parser receives 0x02/0x17, decomposes it to 0x2/0x2 && 0x0/0x15 (as
> flowspec allows just all-zero and all-one masks) and that is displayed
> (just with ','). We should be probably smarter and compose it back to
> 0x02/0x17 during display.

Eh, don't care too much about recomposition, its kinda nice to see what was received on the wire.

Thanks,
Matt