Different behaviour for "show route" with "filtered"?
Robert Scheck
bird at robert-scheck.de
Thu Feb 27 01:21:50 CET 2020
On Tue, 25 Feb 2020, Ondrej Zajicek wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 09:25:23PM +0100, Robert Scheck wrote:
> > show route for 209.24.0.3 filtered # Doesn't work
>
> This does not work as expected, because longest-prefix-match code ('for')
> checks just existing routes - i.e. it finds best matching prefix with valid
> routes, and then shows filtered routes on that prefix. That is probably not
> what users expect.
>
> Question is how it should behave - it seems to me that it should do
> best-match just between filtered routes. Any opinion?
My expectation was finding best matching prefix with filtered routes (thus
the same behaviour like for valid routes).
Regards,
Robert
More information about the Bird-users
mailing list