Disregard OSPF path

[Ondrej Zajicek]

On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 01:22:22PM +0100, Robert Sander wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On 17.02.20 09:03, Kees Meijs wrote:
> > 
> > The path I'm trying to avoid has the lowest OSPF cost but in the
> > physical world the most... :-)
> 
> I always thought the OSPF cost represents the "physical" cost of a link.

Hi

There is no such think as 'physical' cost of a link. Cost is always an
administrative property. There are several physical properties of a link
(like latency, throughput, technology) and it is a question of policy how
to convert them to OSPF cost.

-- 
Elen sila lumenn' omentielvo

Ondrej 'Santiago' Zajicek (email: santiago at crfreenet.org)
OpenPGP encrypted e-mails preferred (KeyID 0x11DEADC3, wwwkeys.pgp.net)
"To err is human -- to blame it on a computer is even more so."