OSPF in VRF
Ticlea Alexandru
ticlea_alexandru at yahoo.com
Fri Mar 9 11:02:08 CET 2018
Indeed, with 4.15 it worksIn my former kernel 4.9, the net.ipv4.tcp_l3mdev_accept was missing.
That's the cause or 4.15 has another vrf implementation?
On Friday, March 9, 2018, 12:31:12 AM GMT+2, Ondrej Zajicek <santiago at crfreenet.org> wrote:
On Thu, Mar 08, 2018 at 09:55:03PM +0000, Ticlea Alexandru wrote:
> Hello
> Is possible to run ospf instance over an interface which is part of an VRF?I make a config but I see I see no package from local instance on VRF interfaceThe log shows the Hello package are sent out using physical interface
> Config is like
Hello
It should work, but require recent kernel. Works for me on 4.14.13,
i think (but not sure) it would work on 4.13, but not older.
> ipv4 table vrf_private;
>
> protocol kernel kernel_vrf_private {
> scan time 1;
> vrf "vrf-private";
> #kernel table 200;
You should specify the kernel table associated with the VRF.
> protocol ospf ospf_local_core {
> vrf "vrf-private";
> ipv4 {
> table vrf_private;
> import all;
> export all;
> };
> disabled off;
> instance id 0;
> debug {
> states,
> routes,
> filters,
> interfaces,
> events,
> packets
> };
> area 0.0.0.0 {
> interface 1.2.3.0/24, "ens256", "vrf-private" , 172.31.254.0/24 {
I would not add "vrf-private" interface as an active OSPF interface. Just
the regular interfaces that are a part of the VRF.
--
Elen sila lumenn' omentielvo
Ondrej 'Santiago' Zajicek (email: santiago at crfreenet.org)
OpenPGP encrypted e-mails preferred (KeyID 0x11DEADC3, wwwkeys.pgp.net)
"To err is human -- to blame it on a computer is even more so."
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://trubka.network.cz/pipermail/bird-users/attachments/20180309/14912a91/attachment.html>
More information about the Bird-users
mailing list