[PATCH 2/4] Static protocol supports SADR

[Toke Høiland-Jørgensen]

Ondrej Zajicek <santiago at crfreenet.org> writes:

>> And routes from other protocols with normal IPv6 channels should be
>> transformed to SADR routes with a ::/0 source?
>
> That is a tricky issue. I see four possibilities:
>
> 1) Some hack that allows connecting IP6 channels to SADR_IP6 tables,
> so unmodified protocols could add SADR routes with a ::/0 source.

Semantically, a SADR-aware route with source ::/0 is equivalent to a
non-SADR aware route. So what about a variant of this that makes the
SADR information be always available in the routing table, and just
filters out routes with non-zero source prefix for protocols that are
not SADR-aware?

I'm not sure if it's even necessary with a separate address type for
SADR in this case?

-Toke