[PATCH 2/4] Static protocol supports SADR

[Ondrej Zajicek]

On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 02:17:43PM +0200, Dean wrote:
> >You should add parsing of SADR networks to conf/confbase.Y together with
> >other network types in net_ nonterminal symbol. That would add support
> >of SADR to static procotol automatically.
> >
> >Also, SADR-based recursive routes seems like a whole new can of worms.
> >And we are currently rethinking recursive routes internally. Perhaps
> >you could postpone changes to hostentry and stick with SADR recursive
> >routes dependent on non-SADR IGP tables, which fits to the current
> >framework. Note that this was updated in 2.0-pre1 so that for other
> >network types than IP4/IP6, igp tables are of type IP4/IP6.
> >
> Ok. How do I go about this? Do I make the changes and submit all 4 patches
> again? Or another patch with the config fix and reverting the recursive SADR
> routes?

I will send you comments to other patches, then you could modify all
patches, update to 2.0-pre1 and resubmit them.

-- 
Elen sila lumenn' omentielvo

Ondrej 'Santiago' Zajicek (email: santiago at crfreenet.org)
OpenPGP encrypted e-mails preferred (KeyID 0x11DEADC3, wwwkeys.pgp.net)
"To err is human -- to blame it on a computer is even more so."
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 181 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://trubka.network.cz/pipermail/bird-users/attachments/20170522/514db950/attachment.asc>