Bird 2.0.0 & VRF & Best Practices
Tim Weippert
weiti at weiti.org
Sun Dec 17 20:00:16 CET 2017
Hi List,
i tried Bird 2.0.0, Kernel 4.14.6, Archlinux, VRF separated BGP Peerings.
I get an Config running, where i had an BGP Peering in Global Space and
one in a VRF. As the VRF Config seems "complex" i though maybe i do
something wrong or even more complex as really needed.
I had the following setup:
VM1 - ens10 <----> ens10 - VM2 (Global Space, BGP Peering)
VM1 - VRF RED - ens11 <----> ens11 - VRF RED VM2 ( VRF Peering)
The following is my working config for the Peering "inside" the VRF:
# VRF RED Tests
ipv4 table T_VRF_RED;
protocol kernel K_VRF_RED {
vrf "red";
kernel table 100;
scan time 20;
ipv4 {
table T_VRF_RED;
import all;
export all;
};
}
protocol direct C_VRF_RED {
vrf "red";
ipv4 { table T_VRF_RED; };
interface "ens11";
interface "red"; # Think this can be ommitted ...
}
protocol static S_VRF_RED {
vrf "red";
ipv4 { table T_VRF_RED; };
route 10.10.1.0/24 blackhole;
}
protocol bgp B_VRF_RED {
vrf "red";
local 172.16.10.[1|2] as 65100;
neighbor 172.16.10.[2|1] as 65100;
multihop;
# regular IPv4 unicast (1/1)
ipv4 {
table T_VRF_RED;
import all;
export where source ~ [ RTS_STATIC, RTS_BGP ];
};
}
I tried several configs (with protocol direct, without) but this seems
the only one, i get working Peerings with resolveable next hops.
Is this as intended? Per VRF Kernel, Direct, BGP (Static only in my
test) Protocol to get an working VRF aware / separated routing
instance?
Or is there something i misunderstand or can be simplified?
Thanks for comments.
regards,
tim
--
Tim Weippert
http://weiti.org - weiti at weiti.org
GPG Fingerprint - E704 7303 6FF0 8393 ADB1 398E 67F2 94AE 5995 7DD8
More information about the Bird-users
mailing list