Static routes and BFD
J. Kendzorra
juergen at kendzorra.de
Mon Oct 31 09:44:25 CET 2016
Ondrej Zajicek:
> I think that if there is no explicit 'requestor' for BFD session (like
> static protocol on client), you have to explicitly add neighbors
> in BFD protocol on gateways:
>
> protocol bfd {
> interface "vlan*" {
> passive;
> };
> neighbor 192.168.1.3;
> }
Unfortunately, this doesn't change the outcome me not getting BFD to
work at all. There's multiple ways I tried making it work, but this is
the current config:
# explicit neighbor config on gateway
protocol bfd {
interface "vlan*" {
};
neighbor 192.168.1.6;
debug all;
}
# explicit neighbor config on client
protocol bfd {
interface "vlan*" {
};
neighbor 192.168.1.1;
debug all;
}
# birdc sh bfd session
BIRD 1.6.0 ready.
bfd1:
IP address Interface State Since Interval
Timeout
192.168.1.6 vlan11 Down 01:58:34 1.000 0.000
# birdc sh bfd sess
BIRD 1.6.0 ready.
bfd1:
IP address Interface State Since Interval
Timeout
192.168.1.1 vlan11 Down 01:44:06 1.000 0.000
In can see in a tcpdump that both are sending "Down" messages back and
forth:
tcpdump: verbose output suppressed, use -v or -vv for full protocol decode
listening on vlan11, link-type EN10MB (Ethernet), capture size 65535 bytes
02:35:17.378336 IP 192.168.1.1.15324 > 192.168.1.6.3784: BFDv1, Control,
State Down, Flags: [none], length: 24
02:35:17.529751 IP 192.168.1.6.56135 > 192.168.1.1.3784: BFDv1, Control,
State Down, Flags: [none], length: 24
,-- This is what the logs say on 192.168.1.1:
2016-10-31 02:38:04 -0600 <TRACE> bfd1: Sending CTL to 192.168.1.6 [Down]
2016-10-31 02:38:04 -0600 <TRACE> bfd1: Sending CTL to 192.168.1.6 [Down]
`--
,-- This is what the logs say on 192.168.1.6:
2016-10-31 02:39:29 <TRACE> bfd1: Sending CTL to 192.168.1.1 [Down]
2016-10-31 02:39:29 <TRACE> bfd1: Sending CTL to 192.168.1.1 [Down]
`--
On both nodes:
birdc sh proto | grep bfd:
bfd1 BFD master up 2016-10-26
birdc sh proto | grep bfd:
bfd1 BFD master up 01:44:05
Thanks,
J.
More information about the Bird-users
mailing list