Dynamic cost?

[Michael McConnell]

Thanks for the link, one of these days I’ll have to give Babel a try. Reading section 2.3 Stability Issues sure does hurt my head imaging how wrong that could go (:

--
Michael McConnell
WINK Streaming;
email: michael at winkstreaming.com <mailto:michael at winkstreaming.com>
phone: +1 312 281-5433 x 7400
cell: +506 8706-2389
skype: wink-michael
web: http://winkstreaming.com <http://winkstreaming.com/>
> On Dec 21, 2016, at 2:16 PM, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke at toke.dk> wrote:
> 
> Michael McConnell <michael at winkstreaming.com> writes:
> 
>> Hello Mike,
>> 
>> There is no concept of latency by peer in any main stream routing
>> protocol because latency can be influenced by traffic load, which
>> would create a real mess trying to understand the traffic flow. If you
>> know one link is always lower latency than the next you simply set the
>> cost manually at startup.
> 
> The Babel routing protocol does actually have such a concept; it's not
> currently implemented in Bird, however.
> 
> See https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jonglez-babel-rtt-extension-01 for
> details.
> 
> -Toke

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://trubka.network.cz/pipermail/bird-users/attachments/20161221/299321ac/attachment.html>