BGP extented communities checks

[Arnaud Fenioux]

On 2 Jun 2015, at 11:26, Ondrej Zajicek <santiago at crfreenet.org> wrote:
> 
> On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 11:48:25AM +0200, Arnaud Fenioux wrote:
>> So, I’m surprised RO are not working for me!
> 
> What do you mean by RO were not working for you? RO communities were set in routes
> but matching expressions return bad results?

Indeed, I had extended communities set in the routes by my peers, but in order to match them correctly in my filters I had to use RT and not RO.

Arnaud


>> Could someone update the GitHub examples, as RT seams more logical, and works like expected?
> 
> Perhaps i will fix this.
> 
> --
> Elen sila lumenn' omentielvo
> 
> Ondrej 'Santiago' Zajicek (email: santiago at crfreenet.org)
> OpenPGP encrypted e-mails preferred (KeyID 0x11DEADC3, wwwkeys.pgp.net)
> "To err is human -- to blame it on a computer is even more so."

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 842 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://trubka.network.cz/pipermail/bird-users/attachments/20150608/0fda1c60/attachment.asc>