OSPF and mass route deletion

[Andrew]

I mean host routes mass removing.

Maybe OSPF really isn't best choice for this. Earlier, with quagga, 
there was no troubles with it. I didn't look deeply to RFC, so I thouht 
that single LSA can carry multiple prefixes. Possibly quagga just sends 
packets slower...

14.07.2015 17:47, Olivier Benghozi пишет:
> OSPF doesn't delete "routes", it sends LSAs.
> It seems that you are redistributing a lot of single IP addresses in OSPF (as external routes). So there's one LSA type 5 for each single redistributed /32.
>
> OSPF is not the proper choice for this usecase, and it's not a Quagga or BIRD issue.
> BGP is the protocol to use for such cases. Many routes, few messages, scalability.
>
>
>> Le 14 juil. 2015 à 09:20, Andrew <nitr0 at seti.kr.ua> a écrit :
>>
>> When routes are deleted (for ex., terminating a lot of PPP tunnels for some reason in same time), it seems like each removed route is sent into separate OSPF packet that causes troubles with OSPF in some cases (for ex., there's troubles with old quagga).
>>
>> Is there a possibility to add some rate-limiting (for ex., limit to 10 messages per second), and aggregate separate 'route deleted' messages to one packet?
>