Non-default BGP port

[joel jaeggli]

On 9/30/14 3:03 PM, Gary T. Giesen wrote:
> No other BGP implementation that I know of supports it. Do you have a
> specific reason for wanting to change the BGP port?

the typical rational involves two bgp processes on the same host...

listening  on a non-default typically means only one side can initiate a
connection.

> GTG
> 
> On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 5:06 PM, Matthias Waehlisch
> <m.waehlisch at fu-berlin.de> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>>   do I see it correctly that the destination port to establish the BGP
>> session cannot be changed?
>>
>>   I would really like to have something like
>>
>>      neighbor 1.2.3.4 port 5001 as 64512;
>>
>>
>>   Any reason not to support this?
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks
>>   matthias
>>
>>
>> --
>> Matthias Waehlisch
>> .  Freie Universitaet Berlin, Inst. fuer Informatik, AG CST
>> .  Takustr. 9, D-14195 Berlin, Germany
>> .. mailto:waehlisch at ieee.org .. http://www.inf.fu-berlin.de/~waehl
>> :. Also: http://inet.cpt.haw-hamburg.de .. http://www.link-lab.net
> 


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 243 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://trubka.network.cz/pipermail/bird-users/attachments/20141001/97517fe5/attachment-0001.asc>