BIRD - iBGP between both RS - invalid NEXT-HOP notification.
Javor Kliachev
jkliachev at neterra.net
Thu Mar 20 10:20:20 CET 2014
Hello,
Unfortunately, I still have no response from anybody. The messages
continue to come into our logs.
The iBGP session is UP since more than 1 week and till this moment we
don't have complaints by some member.
But this messages are definitely strange and we would be happy if
someone may give some advice according to
their experience.
For any questions or need more information & debug, please feel free to
contact me at anytime.
I really highly appreciate any help.
Thanks in advance.
Best~
On 03/07/2014 03:35 PM, Javor Kliachev wrote:
> Hello,
>
> We use BIRD as route server for a long time without any problems. We
> have both fully symmetric RS for redundancy.
>
> Yesterday we decided to establish "internal BGP session" between both
> of them. The reason to do this is to achieve prefix symmetric on both
> RS. Some of our members hold BGP session only with one of our route
> servers.
>
> But after establishing this BGP session we began to see the following
> message into our logs on both RS for total random prefixes on
> absolutely random intervals.
>
> Here is part of my bird.log:
> 07-03-2014 14:19:41 R0_29: Invalid NEXT_HOP attribute in route
> 178.254.232.0/21
> 07-03-2014 14:19:41 R0_30: Invalid NEXT_HOP attribute in route
> 178.254.232.0/21
> 07-03-2014 14:18:52 R0_52: Invalid NEXT_HOP attribute in route
> 79.140.156.0/22
> 07-03-2014 14:18:52 R0_52: Invalid NEXT_HOP attribute in route
> 79.140.148.0/22
> 07-03-2014 14:18:52 R0_52: Invalid NEXT_HOP attribute in route
> 79.140.144.0/20
> 07-03-2014 14:18:52 R0_52: Invalid NEXT_HOP attribute in route
> 79.140.152.0/22
> 07-03-2014 14:18:52 R0_52: Invalid NEXT_HOP attribute in route
> 79.140.144.0/22
> 07-03-2014 14:18:52 R0_52: Invalid NEXT_HOP attribute in route
> 79.140.156.0/22
> 07-03-2014 14:18:52 R0_52: Invalid NEXT_HOP attribute in route
> 79.140.144.0/20
> 07-03-2014 14:18:52 R0_52: Invalid NEXT_HOP attribute in route
> 79.140.148.0/22
> 07-03-2014 14:18:52 R0_52: Invalid NEXT_HOP attribute in route
> 79.140.152.0/22
> 07-03-2014 14:18:52 R0_52: Invalid NEXT_HOP attribute in route
> 79.140.144.0/22
> 07-03-2014 14:16:39 R0_29: Invalid NEXT_HOP attribute in route
> 178.254.232.0/21
> 07-03-2014 14:16:39 R0_30: Invalid NEXT_HOP attribute in route
> 178.254.232.0/21
> 07-03-2014 14:01:39 R0_52: Invalid NEXT_HOP attribute in route
> 95.168.66.0/23
> 07-03-2014 14:01:39 R0_52: Invalid NEXT_HOP attribute in route
> 95.168.68.0/23
> 07-03-2014 13:52:02 R0_14: Invalid NEXT_HOP attribute in route
> 151.252.198.0/24
> 07-03-2014 13:51:57 R0_14: Invalid NEXT_HOP attribute in route
> 151.252.198.0/24
> 07-03-2014 13:29:36 R0_87: Invalid NEXT_HOP attribute in route
> 85.11.144.0/20
> 07-03-2014 13:29:28 R0_87: Invalid NEXT_HOP attribute in route
> 85.11.144.0/20
> 07-03-2014 13:29:15 R0_87: Invalid NEXT_HOP attribute in route
> 85.11.144.0/20
> 07-03-2014 13:29:06 R0_87: Invalid NEXT_HOP attribute in route
> 85.11.144.0/20
> 07-03-2014 13:28:14 R0_87: Invalid NEXT_HOP attribute in route
> 85.187.120.0/22
> 07-03-2014 13:28:14 R0_87: Invalid NEXT_HOP attribute in route
> 85.187.120.0/22
> 07-03-2014 13:19:36 R0_87: Invalid NEXT_HOP attribute in route
> 85.187.120.0/22
> 07-03-2014 13:19:31 R0_87: Invalid NEXT_HOP attribute in route
> 85.187.120.0/22
> 07-03-2014 13:19:31 R0_87: Invalid NEXT_HOP attribute in route
> 85.11.144.0/20
> 07-03-2014 13:19:31 R0_87: Invalid NEXT_HOP attribute in route
> 85.187.120.0/22
> 07-03-2014 13:19:22 R0_87: Invalid NEXT_HOP attribute in route
> 85.11.144.0/20
> 07-03-2014 13:13:43 R0_71: Invalid NEXT_HOP attribute in route
> 46.229.194.0/24
> 07-03-2014 13:13:43 R0_71: Invalid NEXT_HOP attribute in route
> 46.229.192.0/23
> 07-03-2014 13:13:42 R0_29: Invalid NEXT_HOP attribute in route
> 46.229.194.0/24
> 07-03-2014 13:13:42 R0_29: Invalid NEXT_HOP attribute in route
> 46.229.192.0/23
> 07-03-2014 13:06:22 R0_60: Invalid NEXT_HOP attribute in route
> 193.104.73.0/24
> 07-03-2014 13:03:54 R0_52: Invalid NEXT_HOP attribute in route
> 178.79.61.0/24
> 07-03-2014 12:54:56 R0_60: Invalid NEXT_HOP attribute in route
> 89.35.114.0/24
> 07-03-2014 12:54:56 R0_60: Invalid NEXT_HOP attribute in route
> 86.105.150.0/24
> 07-03-2014 12:54:56 R0_60: Invalid NEXT_HOP attribute in route
> 46.102.181.0/24
> 07-03-2014 12:54:56 R0_60: Invalid NEXT_HOP attribute in route
> 46.102.176.0/24
> 07-03-2014 12:54:56 R0_60: Invalid NEXT_HOP attribute in route
> 37.156.69.0/24
> 07-03-2014 12:54:25 R0_60: Invalid NEXT_HOP attribute in route
> 188.240.70.0/24
> 07-03-2014 12:54:25 R0_60: Invalid NEXT_HOP attribute in route
> 188.212.157.0/24
> 07-03-2014 12:34:43 R0_52: Invalid NEXT_HOP attribute in route
> 91.148.106.0/24
> 07-03-2014 12:27:48 R0_52: Invalid NEXT_HOP attribute in route
> 91.148.118.0/24
> 07-03-2014 12:16:33 R0_29: Invalid NEXT_HOP attribute in route
> 178.254.232.0/21
> 07-03-2014 12:16:33 R0_30: Invalid NEXT_HOP attribute in route
> 178.254.232.0/21
> 07-03-2014 12:09:39 R0_87: Invalid NEXT_HOP attribute in route
> 85.11.144.0/20
> 07-03-2014 12:09:10 R0_87: Invalid NEXT_HOP attribute in route
> 85.11.144.0/20
> 07-03-2014 12:08:57 R0_87: Invalid NEXT_HOP attribute in route
> 85.187.120.0/22
> 07-03-2014 12:08:50 R0_87: Invalid NEXT_HOP attribute in route
> 85.187.120.0/22
> 07-03-2014 12:08:49 R0_87: Invalid NEXT_HOP attribute in route
> 85.187.120.0/22
> 07-03-2014 12:02:41 R0_52: Invalid NEXT_HOP attribute in route
> 212.200.0.0/21
> 07-03-2014 11:47:01 R0_29: Invalid NEXT_HOP attribute in route
> 178.254.232.0/21
> 07-03-2014 11:47:01 R0_30: Invalid NEXT_HOP attribute in route
> 178.254.232.0/21
> 07-03-2014 10:55:50 R0_60: Invalid NEXT_HOP attribute in route
> 91.206.209.0/24
>
> I had checked many times and make many tests if the next-hop is
> correct and everything looks
> fine but this messages comes permanently :)
>
> We managed to troubleshoot the following behavior and relationship and
> see the following effect:
>
> Our scenario:
>
> 0.100 0.200
> RS1 <- iBGP -> RS2
> | |
> | |
> TEST.AS -----------
> 0.252
>
> TEST.AS announce: 31.13.244.0/24
>
> RS2 learn this prefix as:
>
> 31.13.244.0/24 via 10.1.0.252 on eth0 [R0_252 14:44] * (100)
> [AS60230i]
> via 10.1.0.252 on eth0 [*R0_100* 15:12
> from 10.1.0.100] (100) [AS60230i]
>
>
> As soon as we stop to announce 31.13.244.0/24 from TEST.AS to RS1, in
> the logs of RS1 begin to come the following message:
>
> 07-03-2014 15:10:09R0_252: Invalid NEXT_HOP attribute in route
> 31.13.244.0/24
>
> But when we try to shutdown (administratively ) the session between
> TEST.AS and RS1 this behavior does not occur and everything seems normal.
>
> I hope this information will be useful for resolving this strange issue.
>
> Here is our configuration set on both RS. The real AS number & IPs has
> been changed for security reason :)
>
> # RS2:
> table T65535
>
> protocol pipe P65535 from iBGP_PIPES {
> description "RS1";
> peer table T65535;
> export where RS_PIPE_OUT();
> }
>
> protocol bgp R0_100 from iBGP {
> description "0.100_iBGP_RS1";
> source address 10.1.0.200;
> neighbor 10.1.0.100 as 65535;
> import all;
> export all;
> passive off;
> table T65535;
> route limit 10000;
> gateway direct;
> }
>
>
> # RS1:
> table T65535
>
> protocol pipe P65535 from iBGP_PIPES {
> description "RS2";
> peer table T65535;
> export where RS_PIPE_OUT();
> }
>
> protocol bgp R0_200 from iBGP {
> description "0.200_iBGP_RS1";
> source address 10.1.0.100;
> neighbor 10.1.0.200 as 65535;
> import all;
> export all;
> passive off;
> table T65535;
> route limit 10000;
> gateway direct;
> }
>
> # show bgp summary shows the following:
> # RS2:
> ---------------------------------------------------------------- adv /
> rcv / limit ---
> 0.100_iBGP_RS1 10.1.0.100 65535 Mar06 Established
> 4527/3235/10000
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> # RS1:
> ---------------------------------------------------------------- adv /
> rcv / limit ---
> 0.200_iBGP_RS2 10.1.0.200 65535 Mar06 Established
> 3235/4527/10000
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Any ideas or thoughts are highly appreciated!
>
> Thanks in advance!
>
> --
> ---
> Find out about our new Cloud service - Cloudware.bg
> <http://cloudware.bg/?utm_source=email&utm_medium=signature&utm_content=link&utm_campaign=newwebsite>
> Access anywhere. Manage it yourself. Pay as you go.
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *Javor Kliachev*
> IP Engineer
>
> Neterra Ltd.
> Telephone: +359 2 975 16 16
> Fax: +359 2 975 34 36
> www.neterra.net <http://www.neterra.net>
>
>
--
---
Find out about our new Cloud service - Cloudware.bg
<http://cloudware.bg/?utm_source=email&utm_medium=signature&utm_content=link&utm_campaign=newwebsite>
Access anywhere. Manage it yourself. Pay as you go.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*Javor Kliachev*
IP Engineer
Neterra Ltd.
Telephone: +359 2 975 16 16
Fax: +359 2 975 34 36
www.neterra.net <http://www.neterra.net>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://trubka.network.cz/pipermail/bird-users/attachments/20140320/ce48b255/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the Bird-users
mailing list