BIRD 1.4.0 bugfixes [1/2]

[Alex Bligh]

On 25 Feb 2014, at 06:37, Tore Anderson wrote:

> I question the correctness of putting an interface in any form of DOWN
> state even though there are no addresses assigned. There exists no
> requirement that an interface has addresses, even if it doesn't, it may
> still be UP and have active routes pointing to it. I therefore would ask
> you to consider fixing this in another way, by simply not requiring any
> IP addresses on the interface in order for it to be considered active.

+1. Either this or reliably detect subsequent numbering of the interfaces.

-- 
Alex Bligh