Review my BGP configuration

[Andre Nathan]

Hi Hans

On Wed, 06 Mar 2013, Hans van Kranenburg wrote:

> I assume you mean to say a.b.1.0/24 instead of a.b.0.1/24?

Yes, sorry.

> If there a specific need for advertising the routes you want to send to
> your eBGP peer also via iBGP?

There's no need to send them via iBGP, but since the iBGP session learns
from the central BGP table (t_bgp), it ends up learning them.

Is the best solution to create an import filter in the iBGP session,
ignoring those prefixes? I was wondering about the behavior difference
vs Quagga, where I don't have any iBGP filters but those routes are not
learned in the iBGP session.

Could this be a consequence of using "gateway direct;" in the iBGP
session?

Thanks a lot,
Andre
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 490 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://trubka.network.cz/pipermail/bird-users/attachments/20130307/af6cf1ae/attachment-0001.asc>