iBGP

[Ondrej Zajicek]

On Sun, Jan 06, 2013 at 03:47:32PM +0100, Miłosz Oller wrote:
> Hi
> 
> I configured ibgp witch two routers. On R1 "main" prefix is
> 91.237.68.0/22 (with gw on 68.1 for client network), on R2 "main" is
> 91.231.205.0/24 (with gw on 205.1 for client network).
> 
> If protocol static is configured on both routers like:
> protocol static {
>          route 91.231.205.0/24 reject;
>          route 91.237.68.0/22 reject;
> }
> 
> From R1 network 91.231.205.0/24 is unreachable and from R2
> 91.237.68.0/22 is unreachable.

Perhaps you could use different kinds of static routes, like:

  route 91.231.205.0/24 via "eth0";

  (if 91.231.205.0/24 is a local network)

-- 
Elen sila lumenn' omentielvo

Ondrej 'SanTiago' Zajicek (email: santiago at crfreenet.org)
OpenPGP encrypted e-mails preferred (KeyID 0x11DEADC3, wwwkeys.pgp.net)
"To err is human -- to blame it on a computer is even more so."
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://trubka.network.cz/pipermail/bird-users/attachments/20130106/a69ca823/attachment-0001.asc>