bird under heavy cpu load
lego12239 at yandex.ru
Tue Mar 13 20:40:48 CET 2012
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 03:39:15PM +0100, Martin Mares wrote:
> > Moreover, this approach can improve the situation with kernel scan
> Wouldn't it be better to get rid of kernel scans completely? :-)
> I think they should not be needed on current Linux systems, they are
> there only to make sure that no Netlink packets with updates got dropped.
As i understand, now when i mistakenly delete a route from kernel table,
bird restore it on the next table scan. How will this works without table scan?
More information about the Bird-users