Route selection using MED
xianglong han
xl.dragon.han at gmail.com
Thu Jun 28 22:54:02 CEST 2012
Hi, all
I am building a BGP and OSPF network specified in RFC 3345 which will lead
to a BGP oscillation. see below:
---------------------------------------------------------------
/ -------------------- -------------------- \
| / \ / \ |
| | Cluster 1 | | Cluster 2 | |
| | | | | |
| | | *1 | | |
| | Ra(RR) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Rd(RR) | |
| | . . | | . | |
| | .*5 .*4 | | .*12 | |
| | . . | | . | |
| | Rb(C) Rc(C) | | Re(C) | |
| | . . | | . | |
| \ . . / \ . / |
| ---.------------.--- ---------.---------- |
\ .(10) .(1) AS1 .(0) /
-------.------------.---------------------------.--------------
. . .
------ . ------------ .
/ \ . / \ .
| AS10 | | AS6 |
\ / \ /
------ ------------
. .
. .
. --------------
. / \
| AS100 |- 10.0.0.0/8
\ /
--------------
The problem is, the router Rd does not perform as expected in selecting the
best route.
10.199.0.0/16 via 10.1.7.2 on eth2 [SR 14:30] * (100-/5) [AS65002i]
Type: BGP unicast univ
BGP.origin: IGP
BGP.as_path: 65002
BGP.next_hop: 10.1.5.2
BGP.med: 1
BGP.local_pref: 100
BGP.originator_id: 10.1.4.2
BGP.cluster_list: 10.1.3.3
via 10.1.1.2 on eth3 [SC 14:29] (100/12) [AS65002i]
Type: BGP unicast univ
BGP.origin: IGP
BGP.as_path: 65002
BGP.next_hop: 10.1.1.2
BGP.med: 0
Should the second route in the above route table be better? as it has a
lower med value with the local preference, AS path length and orgins.
Thanks
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://trubka.network.cz/pipermail/bird-users/attachments/20120628/d3a8e5c9/attachment.html>
More information about the Bird-users
mailing list