FreeBSD bugs ;)

[Alexander V. Chernikov]

On 16.01.2012 12:16, Pawel Tyll wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> After  using  bird  for  some  time  now,  I've found few things that are
> annoying me, or simply break things that should work flawlessly ;)
>
> bird>  show protocols all [some BGP protocol]
>      Routes:         19186 imported, 2 exported, 84627 preferred
>
> My guess is that it has something to do with pipes.
>
> I have multiple pipes that do
> import filter {
>    if proto="[some BGP protocol]" then accept;
>    reject;
> };

Can you send me output of
1) show protocol all [some BGP protocol]
2) show protocol all [some pipe protocol]
3) related parts of configuration file (BGP, pipe, tables, filters) with 
description?

>
>
> Problem 2:
>
> bird's reality:
> ng6 up (index=35)
>          PtP Multicast AdminUp LinkUp MTU=1492
>          local.ip/32 (Primary, opposite 192.168.16.35, scope univ)
> vlan3372 up (index=36)
>          PtP Multicast AdminUp LinkUp MTU=1492
>          local.ip/32 (Primary, opposite 192.168.16.171, scope univ)
> ng7 up (index=37)
>          PtP Multicast AdminUp LinkUp MTU=1492
>          local.ip/32 (Primary, opposite 192.168.17.123, scope univ)
>
>
> reality's reality:
> ng4: flags=88d1<UP,POINTOPOINT,RUNNING,NOARP,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST>  metric 0 mtu 1492
>          inet local.ip -->  192.168.16.35 netmask 0xffffffff
> ng6: flags=88d1<UP,POINTOPOINT,RUNNING,NOARP,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST>  metric 0 mtu 1492
>          inet local.ip -->  192.168.16.171 netmask 0xffffffff
> ng7: flags=88d1<UP,POINTOPOINT,RUNNING,NOARP,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST>  metric 0 mtu 1492
>          inet local.ip -->  192.168.17.123 netmask 0xffffffff
> # ifconfig vlan3372
> ifconfig: interface vlan3372 does not exist
>
> Above happened after I decided that I don't feel like wanting vlan3372
> and  changed  it  to  something  else.  In  the meantime some customer
> decided to open PPPoE session, not knowing this will spell his doom :>
>
> bird   also   happily  ignores  interface  name changes, which hinders
> nice features such as interface "name*" etc.

Yes, there is a problem.
I'll try to look at this in several days since I need this fixed, too.

>
>
> Thanks for reading. :)
>
>