advertising peer PPP addresses

[Ondrej Zajicek]

On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 04:41:20PM +0500, Timur Irmatov wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 4:29 PM, Ondrej Zajicek <santiago at crfreenet.org> wrote:
> > Another way is to anounce them as 'remote pool' together as a prefix
> > (if they are).
> 
> Could you please elaborate?

If the other ends of PPP links have addresses that could be propagated
together as one (or several) prefix, just propagate that prefix and
not the individual addresses.

> >> Also, what is the best way to advertise local pool for those PPP
> >> interfaces? One that I see is:
> >>
> >> protocol static {
> >>         export none;
> >>       import all;
> >>         route 192.168.134/24 drop;
> >> };
> >
> > That is a good idea, another way is to use 'stubnet 192.168.134/24;'
> > in ospf area.
> 
> May be I am misunderstanding something, but adding (just for test)
> 'stubnet 10.255.255.0/24' does not make that network known to other
> neighboring routers.

It should. Does it show as stubnet in 'show ospf state' ?

-- 
Elen sila lumenn' omentielvo

Ondrej 'SanTiago' Zajicek (email: santiago at crfreenet.org)
OpenPGP encrypted e-mails preferred (KeyID 0x11DEADC3, wwwkeys.pgp.net)
"To err is human -- to blame it on a computer is even more so."
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://trubka.network.cz/pipermail/bird-users/attachments/20111127/f22c2618/attachment-0003.asc>