Hold timer expired: difference between Received/Error

[Arnold Nipper]

Matthew,

on 29.06.2011 01:59 Matthew Walster wrote:

> I could be wrong, but the most logical explanation would be:
> 
>> 2011-04-29 18:24:36 <RMT> XXXX: Received: Hold timer expired
> 
> Notification received, hold timer expired (error code 3.4, as per RFC1771).
> 
>> 2011-04-30 00:05:42 <RMT> YYYY: Error: Hold timer expired
> 
> Hold timer expired locally. Presumably a notification would be
> generated and sent to the remote peer before session tear-down.
> 
> Is that not the case?
> 

Would make sense. Otoh iirc <RMT> means that the message is received
from the ReMoTe peer. I may be wrong.



Arnold
-- 
Arnold Nipper / nIPper consulting, Sandhausen, Germany
email: arnold at nipper.de       phone: +49 6224 9259 299
mobile: +49 152 53717690      fax:   +49 6224 9259 333

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 260 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://trubka.network.cz/pipermail/bird-users/attachments/20110629/91996008/attachment-0001.asc>