Hold timer expired: difference between Received/Error

[Arnold Nipper]

on 01.07.2011 12:14 Ondrej Zajicek wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 01, 2011 at 04:01:19AM +0200, Arnold Nipper wrote:
>> on 30.06.2011 21:06 Ondrej Zajicek wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 02:25:20PM +0200, Arnold Nipper wrote:
>>>>> Yes, exactly that.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks ... and what does "<RMT>" stand for? When analysing the log I see
>>>>
>>>> flags. All but "RMT" at least have an intuitive meaning to me.
>>>
>>> You are right:
>>>
>>>> Otoh iirc <RMT> means that the message is received from the ReMoTe peer
>>>
>>
>> Aren't you contradicting yourself?
> 
> I didn't noticed that 'Error: Hold timer expired' also uses '<RMT>'.
> This is probably a bug, perhaps there should be '<ERR>'.
> 

Not too sure what would be appropriate. Imho it's not really an error,
isn't it? '<WARN>' or '<INFO>' could also do. But I agree it shouldn't
be '<RMT>'



Arnold
-- 
Arnold Nipper / nIPper consulting, Sandhausen, Germany
email: arnold at nipper.de       phone: +49 6224 9259 299
mobile: +49 152 53717690      fax:   +49 6224 9259 333

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 260 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://trubka.network.cz/pipermail/bird-users/attachments/20110701/7d9e4404/attachment-0001.asc>