Hold timer expired: difference between Received/Error
Arnold Nipper
arnold at nipper.de
Fri Jul 1 04:01:19 CEST 2011
on 30.06.2011 21:06 Ondrej Zajicek wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 02:25:20PM +0200, Arnold Nipper wrote:
>>> Yes, exactly that.
>>>
>>
>> Thanks ... and what does "<RMT>" stand for? When analysing the log I see
>>
>> flags. All but "RMT" at least have an intuitive meaning to me.
>
> You are right:
>
>> Otoh iirc <RMT> means that the message is received from the ReMoTe peer
>
Aren't you contradicting yourself?
On one hand a log message like
2011-04-30 00:05:42 <RMT> YYYY: Error: Hold timer expired
does indicate ("<RMT>" flag) that it is received from the remote peer.
On the other hand you say it means that the hold timer expired locally.
Presumably a notification would be generated and sent to the remote peer
before session tear-down.
That does at least not make sense to me.
Arnold
--
Arnold Nipper / nIPper consulting, Sandhausen, Germany
email: arnold at nipper.de phone: +49 6224 9259 299
mobile: +49 152 53717690 fax: +49 6224 9259 333
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 260 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://trubka.network.cz/pipermail/bird-users/attachments/20110701/1a2d31a0/attachment.asc>
More information about the Bird-users
mailing list