Unreachable next-hop over bgp

[Ondrej Zajicek]

On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 07:53:34PM +0100, Alex Bligh wrote:
>
>
> --On 17 August 2011 20:27:05 +0200 Ondrej Zajicek 
> <santiago at crfreenet.org> wrote:
>
>>>> How are such interface routes meant to get into the FIB?
>>
>> Short answer is to use 'direct' protocol to populate BIRD routing table
>> by device routes.
>
> Perfect, thanks.
>
> It might be worth noting for your docs that if you are writing a
> filter, these come in as RTS_DIRECT (obvious), but kernel routes
> come in as RTS_INHERIT (not obvious that 'INHERIT' means 'KERNEL',
> an RTS_KERNEL synonym would be nice).

You are right, this is cryptic.

-- 
Elen sila lumenn' omentielvo

Ondrej 'SanTiago' Zajicek (email: santiago at crfreenet.org)
OpenPGP encrypted e-mails preferred (KeyID 0x11DEADC3, wwwkeys.pgp.net)
"To err is human -- to blame it on a computer is even more so."
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://trubka.network.cz/pipermail/bird-users/attachments/20110817/45a8e582/attachment-0001.asc>