Pipe collision detected when sending to table

Ondrej Zajicek santiago at crfreenet.org
Mon Sep 27 16:45:33 CEST 2010

On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 11:53:47PM +0200, Bernhard Hahn wrote:
>  Hi Ondrej,
> thanks for the explanation.
> Am 25.09.2010 18:49, schrieb Ondrej Zajicek:
> > The proper way to fix this is to add a filter on a pipe from a peer
> > table to the collector table to propagate only the routes from an
> > attached BGP protocol (and not the routes received transitively from
> > the master table).
> Does that mean something like a "where from=neighbor_IP" statement or is
> there a built-in statement or flag to refer to attached protocols?

Yes, testing 'from' is probably the best way to do.

> Is there any harm to be expected running the current configuration,
> except huge log output?

I think this should not cause any problems, esp. if you do not export
anything from the collector table. Perhaps some inconsistent

Elen sila lumenn' omentielvo

Ondrej 'SanTiago' Zajicek (email: santiago at crfreenet.org)
OpenPGP encrypted e-mails preferred (KeyID 0x11DEADC3, wwwkeys.pgp.net)
"To err is human -- to blame it on a computer is even more so."
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://trubka.network.cz/pipermail/bird-users/attachments/20100927/89dcea88/attachment-0001.asc>

More information about the Bird-users mailing list