minor bird crash

[Ondrej Zajicek]

On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 11:25:07PM +0100, Arnold Nipper wrote:
> On 22.03.2010 13:49 Ondrej Zajicek wrote
> 
> > On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 11:16:49PM +0100, Arnold Nipper wrote:
> >> Anyway, doing "configure soft" followed by reloading all pipes leads to
> >> re-installing every single route. That definitely is not what I want the
> >> routeserver to do.
> > 
> > Re-installing means that these routes are sent as updates by BGP protocol
> > to BGP neighbors? Such behavior is unexpected and is different that
> > i see in my testing configuration.
> > 
> 
> Re-installing means that every single route has gotten its timestamp
> updated. Both master table as well as each per peer table. From that I
> also conclude that these routes are are sent as updates by BGP protocol
> to BGP neighbors.

No, the timestamp is updated, but the route is the same and therefore is
not propagated to other protocols (BGP). You can check that using
counters in BGP protocols. Perhaps the fact that timestamp is updated
even in this case is misleading.

-- 
Elen sila lumenn' omentielvo

Ondrej 'SanTiago' Zajicek (email: santiago at crfreenet.org)
OpenPGP encrypted e-mails preferred (KeyID 0x11DEADC3, wwwkeys.pgp.net)
"To err is human -- to blame it on a computer is even more so."
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://trubka.network.cz/pipermail/bird-users/attachments/20100323/76bc980b/attachment-0001.asc>