BIRD Route-Server template configuration
Wolfgang Hennerbichler
wh at univie.ac.at
Fri Sep 11 08:58:30 CEST 2009
Good Morning Ondrej,
I've got bird running in a test-setup where it's already working great
as a route-server with an extremely low memory footprint. Grats for
that! I'm also getting more and more confident in working with,
understanding and using bird. However a question that came to my mind
is the strategy you chose here:
On 21.08.2009, at 22:50, Ondrej Filip wrote:
>
> All session are unfiltered (except max prefix limit) and
> connected to routing table named T<AS#>. So it means all prefixes
> received from R25192x1 and R25192x2 are store in routing table called
> T25192. Each AS has its own routing table. All those routing table are
> connected to the master RT by pipe protocols named P<AS#>. Filtering
> (both in and out) is applied on those PIPE protocols.
Why don't you filter in the BGP sessions directly instead of in the
pipe-protocol, this saves you some precious memory and doesn't do any
harm, or am I wrong in my thinking?
Wolfgang
--
www.vix.at | www.aco.net
wh at univie.ac.at | WH844-RIPE
Vienna University Computer Center
More information about the Bird-users
mailing list