Support for BGP route reflection.

[Ondrej Zajicek]

On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 10:39:03AM +0200, Martin Mares wrote:
> Hi!
> 
> > Fixes are attached as patch following bird-md5.diff . Or should
> > i send corrected original patches?
> 
> Please send corrected original patches, it will be easier to
> follow in the history.

OK, here they are.

> > BTW, in bgp_rte_better() we compare MEDs between routes from different
> > ASes, although RFC says that MED is only comparable between routes
> > learned from the same neighboring AS. Is this bug or some cleverness?
> 
> The same-AS rule has been introduced in RFC 4271, which is much newer
> than the BGP code in BIRD. The tie breaking algorithm in RFC 1771
> compares MEDs even for different ASes.

Thank you for explanation, i will fix it.

-- 
Elen sila lumenn' omentielvo

Ondrej 'SanTiago' Zajicek (email: santiago at crfreenet.org)
OpenPGP encrypted e-mails preferred (KeyID 0x11DEADC3, wwwkeys.pgp.net)
"To err is human -- to blame it on a computer is even more so."
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 1-bird-as4.diff
Type: text/x-diff
Size: 38547 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://trubka.network.cz/pipermail/bird-users/attachments/20081015/2fb43ade/attachment-0002.diff>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 2-bird-md5.diff
Type: text/x-diff
Size: 7366 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://trubka.network.cz/pipermail/bird-users/attachments/20081015/2fb43ade/attachment-0003.diff>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://trubka.network.cz/pipermail/bird-users/attachments/20081015/2fb43ade/attachment-0001.asc>