reject debug messages

Jonathan Stewart jonathan.stewart at gmail.com
Mon May 23 08:42:46 CEST 2016


Are those routes part of your own AS?  Is there anything special about the
rejected routes?

On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 2:05 AM, Angel <angel at bitnap.net> wrote:

> Hello,
>
> We are configuring a new bird router, and after configure a carrier, we
> can see following messages on debug every minute:
>
> ------------
> >>> AS174transit > added [best] 193.148.120.0/24 via 149.6.130.137 on ix0
> >>> AS174transit < rejected by protocol 193.148.120.0/24 via
> 149.6.130.137 on ix0
> >>> AS174transit > added [best] 193.148.126.0/24 via 149.6.130.137 on ix0
> >>> AS174transit < rejected by protocol 193.148.126.0/24 via
> 149.6.130.137 on ix0
> >>> AS174transit > added [best] 193.148.125.0/24 via 149.6.130.137 on ix0
> >>> AS174transit < rejected by protocol 193.148.125.0/24 via
> 149.6.130.137 on ix0
> >>> AS174transit > added [best] 193.148.121.0/24 via 149.6.130.137 on ix0
> >>> AS174transit < rejected by protocol 193.148.121.0/24 via
> 149.6.130.137 on ix0
> >>> AS174transit > added [best] 81.17.142.0/24 via 149.6.130.137 on ix0
> >>> AS174transit < rejected by protocol 81.17.142.0/24 via 149.6.130.137
> on ix0
> >>> AS174transit > added [best] 91.198.226.0/24 via 149.6.130.137 on ix0
> >>> AS174transit < rejected by protocol 91.198.226.0/24 via 149.6.130.137
> on ix0
> >>> AS174transit > added [best] 85.140.116.0/22 via 149.6.130.137 on ix0
> >>> AS174transit < rejected by protocol 85.140.116.0/22 via 149.6.130.137
> on ix0
> >>> AS174transit > added [best] 195.128.159.0/24 via 149.6.130.137 on ix0
> >>> AS174transit < rejected by protocol 195.128.159.0/24 via
> 149.6.130.137 on ix0
> >>> AS174transit > added [best] 46.225.128.0/19 via 149.6.130.137 on ix0
> >>> AS174transit < rejected by protocol 46.225.128.0/19 via 149.6.130.137
> on ix0
> >>> AS174transit > added [best] 46.225.96.0/19 via 149.6.130.137 on ix0
> >>> AS174transit < rejected by protocol 46.225.96.0/19 via 149.6.130.137
> on ix0
> >>> AS174transit > added [best] 46.224.7.0/24 via 149.6.130.137 on ix0
> >>> AS174transit < rejected by protocol 46.224.7.0/24 via 149.6.130.137
> on ix0
> >>> AS174transit > added [best] 46.225.224.0/19 via 149.6.130.137 on ix0
> >>> AS174transit < rejected by protocol 46.225.224.0/19 via 149.6.130.137
> on ix0
> >>> AS174transit > added [best] 46.225.0.0/19 via 149.6.130.137 on ix0
> >>> AS174transit < rejected by protocol 46.225.0.0/19 via 149.6.130.137
> on ix0
> >>> AS174transit > added [best] 46.224.96.0/19 via 149.6.130.137 on ix0
> >>> AS174transit < rejected by protocol 46.224.96.0/19 via 149.6.130.137
> on ix0
> >>> AS174transit > added [best] 46.225.32.0/19 via 149.6.130.137 on ix0
> >>> AS174transit < rejected by protocol 46.225.32.0/19 via 149.6.130.137
> on ix0
> >>> AS174transit > added [best] 46.224.128.0/19 via 149.6.130.137 on ix0
> >>> AS174transit < rejected by protocol 46.224.128.0/19 via 149.6.130.137
> on ix0
> >>> AS174transit > ignored 109.72.148.0/22 via 149.6.130.137 on ix0
> >>> AS174transit > ignored 109.72.147.0/24 via 149.6.130.137 on ix0
> >>> AS174transit > ignored 109.72.146.0/24 via 149.6.130.137 on ix0
> >>> AS174transit > ignored 109.72.145.0/24 via 149.6.130.137 on ix0
> >>> AS174transit > ignored 109.72.144.0/24 via 149.6.130.137 on ix0
> >>> AS174transit > ignored 37.46.114.0/24 via 149.6.130.137 on ix0
> >>> AS174transit > ignored 109.248.240.0/22 via 149.6.130.137 on ix0
> >>> AS174transit > ignored 109.248.242.0/24 via 149.6.130.137 on ix0
> >>> AS174transit > ignored 109.248.241.0/24 via 149.6.130.137 on ix0
> >>> AS174transit > ignored 109.248.240.0/24 via 149.6.130.137 on ix0
> >>> AS174transit > ignored 109.248.225.0/24 via 149.6.130.137 on ix0
> >>> AS174transit > ignored 109.248.224.0/24 via 149.6.130.137 on ix0
>
> ------------
>
> We understand that added messages is because carrier sent us new routes,
> ignored looks like that we know this route, so we do not need to add to our
> table, but what about rejected messages?  How could we fix it? What could
> be our misconfiguration?
>
> Regards,
>



-- 
     Jonathan
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://trubka.network.cz/pipermail/bird-users/attachments/20160523/9a84d610/attachment.html>


More information about the Bird-users mailing list