santiago at crfreenet.org
Mon Aug 25 12:03:53 CEST 2008
On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 11:49:21AM +0200, Martin Mares wrote:
> The /30 networks can be considered point-to-point links in some cases,
> so we maintain the address of the other end in the same way as we do
> for unnumbered P-t-P networks.
Hmm, but perhaps there is some another bug:
ath0 up (index=4)
MultiAccess Broadcast Multicast AdminUp LinkUp MTU=1500
192.168.31.18/30 (Primary, broadcast 192.168.31.19, opposite 192.168.31.19, scope site)
opposite should be 192.168.31.17
#define ipa_opposite(x) _MI(_I(x) ^ 1)
- this is correct for /31 ptp links (that are valid according to
RFC 3021), but not for /30 ptp links. There should be ^ 3 ?
Elen sila lumenn' omentielvo
Ondrej 'SanTiago' Zajicek (email: santiago at crfreenet.org)
OpenPGP encrypted e-mails preferred (KeyID 0x11DEADC3, wwwkeys.pgp.net)
"To err is human -- to blame it on a computer is even more so."
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
More information about the Bird-users